Tag Archives: Disquieting Visions

Freebie Friday: Charles Gannon

Our guest blogger this week, Charles Gannon was kind enough to share the following poem with us:

The Charge of the Flight Brigade – removed from Charles’ forthcoming Baen novel.

The Charge of the Flight Brigade final to download.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Freebie Friday, Guest Blogger

Whither the Werewolf?

by Gail Z. Martin

Werewolves are the new hot, hairy heartthrobs.  Whether it’s Patricia Briggs’ Mercy Thompson series or the uber-handsome werewolves in MaryJanice Davidson’s Queen Betsy books, or Quentin in Dark Shadows, or even the tragic Remus Lupin in Harry Potter, werewolves are the bad boys you can’t help but love.

In many ways, the werewolf has always depicted the brutal side of male behavior. And the truth is, there’s nothing sexy about domestic violence.  (Read Tanith Lee’s take on the Little Red Riding Hood story in Red as Blood to turn this trope on its head.) Yet today’s werewolves manage to soften that brutality by focusing their aggression outwards against threats to the mate, rather than internally against their family.

So here’s my question—how domesticated can we make werewolves before they become puppy dogs?  Are we reflecting a desire to find a wolf—or a golden retriever?  And if the wolf is a little too scary, is a German shepherd or a pit bull good enough?

Don’t get me wrong—I think there’s room for people to want a broad spectrum of werewolves, from alpha males to Yorkies (well, maybe that’s going a little far).  And perhaps it’s no different than the trend to shift a vampire from being a monster to being a ultimate-warrior male who is tender at home and rips heads off out in the street (it’s business, not personal).

Yet in many ways, werewolves are traditionally more duel natured than vampires, because vampires never cease being undead, while werewolves are just like the rest of us except around the full moon.  I’ve always thought that real violence is more a part of the werewolf mythos than the vampire trope because a vampire can take blood without killing, and even provide an orgasm for the donor.  Getting gnawed on by a wolf, on the other hand, is more of a downer.

Is there a point to this rambling?  Probably not.  Just some random observations and a few unanswered questions.  I’d love to hear your thoughts.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Gail Z. Martin

It’s Epic–and It’s American

by Charles Gannon

A thought-piece on the nature of American Narratives

Arguably, there are some useful analogies between cooking a gourmet dish and cooking up a saleable story.   One of the analogies resides in the multiple avenues of  sampling and analysis that are possible.  To choose a pertinent example, one can choose to assess the dish itself, or the ingredients that are used to create it.  The latter is my focus in this micro-essay—and the narrative cuisine in question is science fiction.

While not particular to any region, science fiction seems to be served up in the US far more frequently–and with greater gusto—than any other country. It is also not known for being a ”light” cuisine: science fiction narratives tend to be sizable repasts. This does not imply that they are always intellectually nourishing (as evinced by the ideational junk-food that still dominates the output of Hollywood) but usually do manage to sate audiences’ appetites for action and adventure; they are filling, at the very least. Or, in overtly literary terms, they are rarely humble opuscules; they are usually ambitious epics.

So,by this (threadbare) process of analogical deduction, an examination of the nature—and impulses—of the American Epic should, potentially, explicate certain of the creative threads that are both employed by, and give shape to, American science fiction.  However, since there are plenty of American epics that are not science fictional, perhaps it makes sense to approach this topic through a sub-genre that is seasoned by both the mainstream and genre traditions. Consequently, American “bigger-than-life” disaster narratives may prove to be a useful point of entry into the subject–of which, because of this short fomat, we may only  expect a fleeting glance, not detailed scrutiny.

*     *     *

Arguably, many, if not most, American epics are morality plays cum primers which either reprise, revise, or rejuvenate what might be called the nation ‘s “moral self-image in the course of a crisis.”  The Towering Inferno, The Poseidon Adventure, 2012, Earthquake, and Deep Impact all have this in common: a group of individuals who are spun from  the very warp and woof of the nation’s life must work together to rise above the challenge that they face.  In the course of so doing, differences of class, ethnicity/race, gender, region, education, experience, are shown to be not merely baseless, but impediments that must be shed in the face of a crisis.  Those who cannot, or (more severely) will not give in to this situational compulsion for what might be called “cultural transcendance” almost inevitably meet grisly ends, usually hoist by their own petards and expiring unlamented.  Other, right-thinking persons may die along the way, but they are memorialized, held up as examples (often to a recidivistic group member who is shamed into moral rectitude by the sacrifice of the deceased).  Perhaps the most trite and hackneyed version of this latter trope is that of the righteous person of color who voluntarily sacrifices him/her-self to ensure the survival of the rest of the group—including the prerequisite bigot—when a desperate but ingenious bid to escape the onrushing forces of destruction goes horribly and unpredictably awry in the film’s penultimate scene.

What are the core “cultural values” being celebrated by these narrative tropes and structures—and so many others which there is no space to list here? And why are they (as a syncretic whole) so peculirly American?

There are many possible reasons (and I warmly encourage others to take up the ennumeration and analysis of all of them) but I can only deal with one here, so I will focus on what I consider both the strongest, and also, the most provocative, factor in the mix:  these tropes establish the essential national virtue of American culture–a value with deep, even urgent roots in the nation’s social contracts. Specifically, these narratives indicate that a ‘good’—and certainly a ‘heroic’—American need not be shrewd, or strong, or deft. But two traits are required—prerequisites for which no substitutes are allowed or tolerated: the hero of an American Epic must have the qualities of basic integrity (“say what you mean; do what you say)” and determination (never give up and always do your best).

What is most interesting and illuminating about these traits is their utterly democratic nature, insofar as any person may aspire to excel at them, regardless of other innate talents, predispositions, or impediments. These are the qualities celebrated not just in the form of bold heroes upon battlefields or stranded in the wilderness, but also in the Special Olympics, where physical and mental disabilities present a steep and unforgiving challenge to the participants. But that challenge becomes a peculiarly poignant and powerful opportunity to express the epic-heroic values of integrity and determination, largely because it is a foregone conclusion that no one in the special Olympics is going to set a true world’s record. Nor are they going to earn mention in the Guinness Book of World Sports Records.  And because of that, the entire emphasis, and test, of the Special Olympics is focused upon those two qualities to which anyone may aspire, and therefore, which are celebrated as the only prerequisite American (because universal) traits: integrity and determination. The political and social pragmatism (and constancy) of this valuation is a noteworthy feature of most American epics: each one serves as a kind of “folk-tale” retelling, reinforcement, and revalidation of the nation’s most fundamental juridical, political, and philosophical credos.  In essence, America reasserts, restores, and remakes itself it in every epic that it produces. And its science fiction epics are no exceptions to this rule: indeed, they may be its exemplars. But that, alas, would be the subject of another micro-essay…

Other cultures may dismiss the basic values celebrated in America’s epics as childishly delusional: that lauding mere determination and integrity simply means that the morality of an idealized playground has been hypertrophied into a cultural ideology.  This may be true, to some degree, and to the degree that it is, it may say and reveal something about America’s adolescent zeal and immaturity, about its idealism, and perhaps its uncritical self-confidence. But it may also reveal something about people who perceive only ingenuousness in such values,  may reveal not merely their worldiness, but also a predisposition toward niggardly pessismism, toward a prudent but self-limiting cynicism. As one philosopher observed, every object has the defects of its virtues.  Apparently, different cultures and their epics are not exceptions to this rule.

In closing, look for America in all its epics. But especially, look for the nation in its seemingly non-political science fictional epics, because—since the tales are usually freed of the specific flags and partisan outcries of the moment—they often hold a clearer lens up to America’s core heroic values than any other narratives do—or can.

You can listen to the audio from when Charles was a guest of Blog Host, Gail Z. Martin’s Ghost in the Machine podcast here:  https://www.audioacrobat.com/play/WVkgV7SX

Leave a Comment

Filed under Guest Blogger

Freebie Friday from Benjamin Tate

Our guest blogger, Benjamin Tate, is gracious enough to share the first six chapters of his  book, The Skewed Throne.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Freebie Friday, Guest Blogger

Vampire Trends: the more things change, the more they stay the same

by Gail Z. Martin

Ok, this will probably come as a big surprise, but I love vampires.  Yeah, I know, you already guessed.  If you’ve been following my recently read books on @GailZMartin or Shelfari, you know I’ve just read through all 9 of MaryJanice Davidson’s Queen Betsy books (the Undead and Unwed series).  They’re fun and sassy and light, and quite a hoot.  Just to give myself whiplash, I then started to read Hotel Transylvania by Chelsea Quinn Yarbro, with her oh, so sexy and mysterious Count Saint-Germain.  Completely different in tone and setting, but very engrossing.  And just to round it out, my husband and I started watching the 1991 remake of Dark Shadows on Netflix, with Ben Cross as Barnabas Collins.

Which got me thinking—my how our vampires have changed.  The original Dark Shadows was a product of the 1960s, and the remake stayed pretty faithful to the plot arc of the original.  It had a vampire yearning to be human again long before Anne Rice’s Louis, and it’s interesting to me to see that even in 1991, the idea that Barnabas and Victoria could be together without him needing to end his existence as a vampire was completely beyond thought.  Of course, in many of today’s urban fantasy books, mortals mix with many supernaturals and taking a lover among the undead is no big deal.  The subtitle of Hotel Transylvania is “a novel of forbidden love” so in the 1970s, when it was published, there was still a bigger taboo against mortal/vampire love than there is today.

Then there’s the whole vampire gravitas thing.  Saint-Germain has it—he’s a serious kind of guy.  Sinclair in the Queen Betsy series also has it—it takes Betsy to lighten him up.  Lestat had macabre humor, but he wasn’t really a lot of laughs.  Barnabas would like to have some fun, but there’s the whole undead thing stopping him. (Speaking of which, in the remake series, why do they shoot scenes in broad daylight with blue sky and pretend it’s nighttime?)

So what’s the point?  Maybe only that some things have to remain the same for us to recognize vampires as vampires.  Daylight doesn’t bother Queen Betsy, but it’s still lethal for everyone else and she can drink anything but can’t eat real food.  Saint-Germain never eats food in public.  Barnabas grieves over having no reflection in a mirror.  Although authors toy with changes around the edges of the vampire mythos, the more things change, the more they do seem to stay the same.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Gail Z. Martin

What’s in a Name

by Joshua Palmatier/Benjamin Tate

First, I’d like to thank Disquieting Visions for having me guest post on their blog. I’m honored, and hope I offer up something interesting for their readers. My name is Benjamin Tate and I’m an author with DAW Books. At the moment, my first novel WELL OF SORROWS is on the shelves and ready to be read and (hopefully) enjoyed by all. The sequel, LEAVES OF FLAME, has already been written and is in the publishing pipeline, with an expected release date in early 2012 (say January or February). The third novel in the trilogy—and yes, there will ONLY be three books in this trilogy—is tentatively titled BREATH OF HEAVEN and should be out sometime in 2013. I also have a short story out there: “An Alewife in Kish” is in AFTER HOURS: TALES FROM THE UR-BAR.

But I’m not just Benjamin Tate. I’m also Joshua Palmatier, DAW Books author. Joshua has three books out at the moment, a complete trilogy titled the Throne of Amenkor, containing the books THE SKEWED THRONE, THE CRACKED THRONE, and THE VACANT THRONE. Joshua also has some short stories on the shelf: “Mastihooba” in CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE URBAN KIND and “Tears of Blood” in BEAUTY HAS HER WAY.

When people find out I have a pseudonym (Benjamin Tate), they invariably want to know why, so I figured I’d address that issue here. There are many reasons to use a pseudonym (and I certainly can’t cover them all), but in the end they almost always come down to marketing in one aspect or another. You see, the publisher is out to sell books. They are trying to find the best way to get the book from the shelf into the reader’s hands, and from there, home. The author wants this as well, although usually their focus is to get the reader to actually READ the book once they get it home. After all, we want you to enjoy what we’ve spent so much time working on. But the reader won’t enjoy the words unless they pick up the book, so marketing is important. And there are two ways to get the book from the shelf into a reader’s hands: the cover art and the name.

The cover art is an entire post on its own, so we’ll focus on the name. For any writer, we’re trying to build up an audience—a group of core readers—who will pick up the book simply because it has our name on it. For example, I pick up every Stephen King book, no matter what the cover art is like, simply because it’s Stephen King. I want my readers to do the same thing. The publisher wants the readers to do the same thing.

So my first books came out under my real name Joshua Palmatier. They sold fairly well, but obviously didn’t explode off the shelf and onto the bestseller lists. If they had, I wouldn’t be writing this post. *grin* Joshua built up a fairly good audience, but when it came time for the beginning of the next trilogy, my publisher approached me with the idea of using a pseudonym. Pseudonyms have been used in the past to great effect for many reasons—when an author switches genre, when they switch from adult fantasy to young adult or vice versa, etc. Here, the idea was to attempt to get more of the new book onto the bookstore shelves by launching a “new” author. You see, bookstores generally use the sales of the previous book by an author as a baseline for how many of the new book to order, so if you sold 10 copies of the previous book, they order in, perhaps, 5 of the new book. This is called the “death spiral,” since the number of books ordered each time typically decreases. Joshua Palmatier was suffering from the death spiral. If the new book was launched under a new name, Benjamin Tate, then the bookstore wouldn’t have any backlist to check, and so would order more copies of the book. More books on the shelf means more book sales, since you’re more likely to buy a book if you have it in hand. That’s the theory anyway.

There’s a downside to using a pseudonym of course. Basically, as an author, you’re starting out from scratch with the new name. You can’t expect the audience that you built up under the first name to be aware of the fact that you’ve changed names. I’ve tried to let all of the Joshua Palmatier fans know that I’m now being published under the name Benjamin Tate—it’s on my webpage (www.joshuapalmatier.com), I announced I on my blog (jpsorrow.livejournal.com), put it on my Facebook page, etc. But recently, at a reading at the World Fantasy Convention, I discovered that at least half of the audience had no idea I was using a different name now. I’m sure there’s someone reading this blog right now who is finding this out for the first time. But it was agreed that the chance of increasing the audience was worth the risk of switching names. So it was done. Did it work? I have no idea. It’s too early to tell.

As a counter to what’s happened here in the United States, the German translations of the Throne of Amenkor books (DIE ASSASSINE, DIE REGENTIN, and DIE KAEMPFERIN) have garnered enough of an audience that the publisher over there is now interested in the new series . . . but only if they can publish them under the name Joshua Palmatier. So there, the audience was large enough that the reasons for using a pseudonym are obsolete.

So that’s what’s in a name . . . or at least what’s in my name. Or names. Whatever. I’m searching for that audience, the one that will buy my books no matter what. Are you part of my audience? Check out some of my books or short stories to find out.

You can listen to the audio from when Benjamin was a guest of Blog Host, Gail Z. Martin’s Ghost in the Machine podcast here:  https://www.audioacrobat.com/play/W6zFv1l7

Leave a Comment

Filed under Guest Blogger

Freebie Friday from Terry Ervin

Our guest blogger, Terry Ervin, was nice enough to share his book trailer for Flank Hawk.

You can view it at:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCVKXkAXOlk

Leave a Comment

Filed under Freebie Friday, Guest Blogger

Myth and Folklore

by Gail Z. Martin

At the last couple of conventions I attended, I was on several panels about myth and folklore.  It was a lot of fun discussing how myth and folklore show up in fantasy, as well as how as writers we use myth and folklore to create our own stories.  We talked about modern myths and how myth influences the real world, both in terms of deliberate mythmaking and pop culture/urban legend terms.  For talking about stories that were thousands of years old, the conversation sometimes got rather heated!

I like to draw inspiration from myth and folklore because I figure that if something about a trope or archetype has captured human imagination for hundreds or thousands of years, it’s good.  So I enjoy adapting and adjusting folkloric and mythic elements to make them my own, and to fit them into the world of the Winter Kingdoms.

Of course the conversation came around to vampires, werewolves and magic, which are intrinsic elements of folklore and mythology.  I mentioned how I still chuckle about the one book reviewer who was very impressed that I had “used urban fantasy tropes like vampires and werewolves” in a medieval, epic fantasy.  Of course, urban fantasy stole the tropes from medieval folklore!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Gail Z. Martin

Goal: A Sequel that Compliments while Truly Standing Alone

by Terry Ervin

I spent a good part of the spring and into the summer figuring out how to write The Blood Sword Gambit (working title), sequel to Flank Hawk and the second novel in the First Civilization’s Legacy series.

A sequel sounds easy, right? Sure, when I typed the “The End” to Flank Hawk, I knew the basics of what would happen in the next novel, and then fleshed it out a bit while submitting Flank Hawk to publishers.

So, what’s the problem? I’m an author, right? And authors know these things. As to the first question: The problem is getting the balance just right. The second question: Yes, authors do know these things, and that’s how I went about finding a way to strike the balance.

What balance? A sequel is a complete work in itself but continues the story of the preceding novel. Blood Sword continues Krish’s story, but to do so it’s necessary for new readers to understand a bit about who Krish is, including friends, associates, and his experiences. While I’d love for those readers that start with the sequel to go back and read Flank Hawk, I want them to be able to enjoy the second novel without having to go back and read the first. But if they do so after reading Blood Sword, I want them to enjoy Flank Hawk—the conflict, struggles and excitement, and discovery of the world in which Krish lives. I also want readers of Flank Hawk to enjoy its sequel, and not to be put off by references to events in the first novel—things necessary for those who haven’t yet read and enjoyed Flank Hawk.

Okay, that’s what every author who writes a series strives to achieve. With that in mind, I went right to the source: Authors who’ve successfully done what I was preparing to attempt.

My Criteria:

a.     Writes action-filled stories, in first person, past tense.

b.     Although one story arc was completed in the first novel, a larger storyline continued to be explored.

c.     Events and choices made in the first novel impacted what happened in the next.

d.     Characters, from close friends to associates in the first novel continued to influence what happened in the second—even those that died or didn’t appear ‘on stage’ in the second novel.

Naturally, I went with authors I’d read previously and enjoyed: Steven Brust (Vlad Taltos series), Roger Zelazny (Chronicles of Amber series) and Laurell K. Hamilton (Anita Blake series).  I read and reread the first two or three novels in each series, and even listened to audio versions when possible, all the time paying close attention to when and how the authors made reference to previous information and events within the context of the second novel’s storyline.

It reaffirmed what I already knew:

1.     There’s no secret formula with respect to when and how much previous information to provide in the sequel.

2.     It’s handy for readers of previous works in the series to be reminded of past events.

3.     Linking the previous storyline with the current one as well as weaving both into the overall direction of the events for novels to follow provides a consistent and enduring foundation for readers to comprehend and recall the who, what, where, when, how and whys of the created world, conflicts and characters.

After the careful study, I also came away with examples of techniques the authors used, including methods and timing that allowed for smooth transitions from present to past and back, while foreshadowing the future.  Things like dialogue and POV character recollection, intertwined with character motivations (directly stated or implied), items and places, scenes and descriptions all played a role.

And as I work to complete The Blood Sword Gambit, I am integrating those techniques, merging them with my own storytelling method and writing style—working to get ‘that balance’ just right.

If you do give Flank Hawk a try, and/or The Blood Sword Gambit (when it’s released), either way I hope you’ll let me know if my effort was a success.

You can listen to the audio from when Terry was a guest of Blog Host, Gail Z. Martin’s Ghost in the Machine podcast here:  https://www.audioacrobat.com/play/WBpTSY07

Leave a Comment

Filed under Guest Blogger

Freebie Friday from Jeffrey Thomas

Our guest blogger, Jeffrey Thomas has graciously offered to share the Punktown-based short story “The Dance of Ugghiutu,” from his short story collection VOICES FROM PUNKTOWN, here: https://www.darkregions.com/template/samples/voices_from_punktown_sample.pdf

Leave a Comment

Filed under Freebie Friday, Guest Blogger